
How thrilled am I that the Grammar Divas agreed to come back for Round Two of their informative blog? Please help me give a great big M & M welcome to Annie Oortman and Darlene Buchholz.
Good morning, everyone. We’re the Grammar Divas! Two fiction writers with a grammar fetish.
Thanks, Liz, for inviting us back to your blog. Today, we thought we talk about a few grammar rules our English teachers drilled into us that have become flexible over the years.
Everyone has his or her own feelings about each one of these. Feel free to share yours, please.
To Split or Not To Split… That Is The Question
An infinitive is the form of a verb that comes after to as in to love, to cheat, or to kill. A split infinitive is when another word (usually an adverb, sometimes an adverbial phrase) comes between to and the verb.
To boldly go where no man has gone before. (The best-know example in the world… err… universe.)
The population is expected to more than double in the next ten years.
For the record, no authoritative grammar and usage text exists that forbids split infinitives.
Remy decided to quickly remove Natasha’s dress.
Now, don’t go all crazy and start splitting infinitives willy-nilly just ‘cause you can. A reader should never be confused about the picture your writing paints. Split infinitives can easily distort that picture. So, if you can move the offending word without losing the gist of your sentence, go for it.
Remy decided quickly to remove Natasha’s dress.
OR
Remy decided to remove Natasha’s dress quickly.
Okay, we fixed the split infinitive, but we didn’t clear up the confusion. Did Remy remove Natasha’s dress quickly or did he make the decision to remove the dress quickly?
Remy decided to remove Natasha’s dress before she changed her mind.
If you have to mangle a sentence to avoid splitting an infinitive, DON’T.
In an attempt to rescue the hostages, the SWAT team decided brazenly to raid the plane. = Awkward
In an attempt to rescue the hostages, the SWAT team decided to brazenly raid the plain. = Better
Split or not to split? It’s up to you.
Starting Sentences With ConjunctionsMost of us were taught not to start a sentence with a conjunction because we could possibility create a sentence fragment, which isn’t a grammatically complete unit.
(On a side note, fragments in fiction are an acceptable style technique. Well done, they add to the professionalism of a polished manuscript. Poorly done, however, they come off like a tryout for the talent show at the annual office Christmas party. For more, check out “Intentional Fragments: Stylish or Fiction Faux Pas” at www.grammardivas.com.)
Know the Fanboys? No, they’re not the latest rap artist or an entry into the rising number of vampire tv shows. (For the record, there is a move called “Fanboys” and a website, but neither has anything to do with the topic at hand.)
Fanboys is an acronym for seven conjunctions that you can start a sentence with as long as you’re very careful. The key is to make sure you include the main clause the word refers to either in the preceding sentence or later in the same sentence.
F—For
A—And
N—Nor
B—But
O—Or
Y—Yet
S—So
Incorrect: And smart, too.
Correct: She was a nice girl. And smart, too.
Simply follow with a comma? No, unless there’s an aside that needs one.
Incorrect: And she loved her job.
Correct: And, despite the extra work, she loved her job.
What about other popular conjunctions? Because is a subordinating conjunction meaning for the reason that or since. It’s okay as a sentence starter as long as you include the main clause later in the sentence.
Because no one believed Steve was gone, no one reported him missing.
Hopefully is an adverb meaning it is hoped (that). Without a comma, it means a moderate amount of hope. With a comma, it means an extreme amount of hope.
Hopefully CatyAnn’s husband would arrive soon.
Hopefully, CatyAnn’s husband was alive.
However is a conjunctive adverb. Without a comma, it means in whatever manner or to what extent. With a comma, it means nevertheless.
However Pollyanna tried, she couldn’t get her mind off Darnell.
Pollyanna couldn’t get her mind off Darnell. However, she wasn’t trying hard enough.
There were (there are/there is) is not grammatically incorrect as a starter, but tends to make your writing weak and boring. It’s easier simply to rewrite.
There were two angry male voices behind the door. VS. Two male voices argued behind the door.
Start a sentence with a conjunction? Go for it, but be careful.
Ending A Sentence With A Preposition
The Grammar Divas butt heads on this one a lot. (A preposition links a noun or pronoun to another word in a sentence and usually indicates direction. Think to, with, from, at, in, near, by, beside, above, and about.)
“Don’t do it,” Annie says. “Simply fix it.” She recognizes that ending a sentence with a preposition isn’t a grammar horror. However, if the goal in fiction writing is to write cleanly and seamlessly and to avoid pulling your reader out of the story, why do it? Since most people believe ending a sentence with a preposition is incorrect, they’ll hone in on the writing and pull themselves out of the story. Since fixing the issue is easy, why not fix it?
Marilyn wondered where her husband had disappeared to.
Marilyn wondered where her husband had disappeared.
A preposition is a terrible thing to end a sentence with.
Ending a sentence with a preposition is a terrible thing to do.
“Wait just a minute, girlfriend,” Darlene says. Although she doesn’t disagree (at least in theory) with Annie’s premise, she’d never encourage anyone to make such a broad stroke of judgment. Ending a sentence with a preposition does not necessarily weaken an idea or sentence structure.
“If love be the food of love, play on;” William Shakespeare, Twelfth Night
“The smallest worm will turn being trodden on.” William Shakespeare, King Henry VI, Pt. III
“Dost thou love life? Then do not squander time; for that’s the stuff life is made of.” Ben Franklin, Poor Richard’s Almanac
Darlene wants you to consider the ending-a-sentence-with-a-preposition rule as a guideline only. But like all guidelines you might decide to ignore, you have a responsibility to know what you’re doing or the rule will come back to bite you in the you-know-what. So do it as long as you keep the meaning clear and don’t create an odd-sounding sentence.
End a sentence with a preposition? It’s up to you.
(For the complete fight… err… discussion, check out “Ending a Sentence with A Preposition… Grammar Divas Point/Counter Point” at www.grammardivas.com.)
What do you think? Split or not to split? Start a sentence with a conjunction? End a sentence with a preposition? We’d love to your experiences and opinions.
Also, feel free to ask a grammar question if you have one. Darlene and I are here to help.
17 comments:
Great post once again, ladies!
I try to follow the "rules" but often break them, using my ear to tell me which way sounds better :-)
Thanks for the clarification.
Good morning, guys. Welcome back. I'll start you off with a question.
I want you to meet my friend Susie.
My sister Jodi is coming to dinner.
Do I need to set these names apart with commas? I've been seeing them without commas a lot recently when I judge contests.
I've been guilty of all the 'infractions' listed. When I first started writing, it was because I had finished my education 20 years earlier--working in a medical lab did not promote good grammar.
But I deliberately make these 'errors' now, because it sounds right for my character.
And yes, I'll get called out on it, but I'm sorry, how many eleven year olds speak or think in perfectly grammatical sentences??
Great post to print out! Now I feel like my palm has been slapped with a ruler. MAN~I have a ton to learn.
Here’s the thing, gals… Contrary to popular belief, grammar is not a sinister conspiracy plot designed by evil English teachers to ruin every writer in the free world’s fun by screwing with personal style. (Seriously, it’s not.)
Grammar organizes language into an understandable, consistent system—more or less. Knowing the “rules” of language gives you power to be clear in your communication. Yes, you can break those rules, but you still have to be in control of the language. Otherwise you separate yourself from those people you most want to communicate with—your readers.
Does Nora Roberts break the rules? Yes. Does Lee Child? Yes. Jennifer Crusie? Yes. Elmore Leonard? Janet Evanovich? Harlan Coben? Yes. Yes. Yes.
Sometimes you toss the rules aside to ensure your readers grasp your meaning. However, here are the “rules” to breaking the “rules:”
Rule #1: Know the rules before you break them. Knowledge makes the difference between using poor grammar effectively or haphazardly.
Rule #2: Break the rules only if doing so ensures the meaning of your sentence is clear. Trading good grammar for poor only works if it ensures good writing.
Rule #3: Break the rules sparingly.
Hi Liz--
Glad to be here this morning!
Your question is about appositives. Normally, an appositive--which renames the noun it is next to, should be set off with commas.
ex. Carrie, my cousin from Detroit, visits Miami every summer.
Her next suspicion, that the knife had blood on it, turned out to be incorrect.
His lifelong hobby, flying airplanes, has become his full time job.
Murky rule alert: But when the appositive is short, we do not set the appositive off. Usually this involves identifying people by name
ex. I want you to meet my friend Susie. Not my friend Sharona)
My sister Jodi is coming to dinner. (Not my sister Karen--or maybe that I think you may not know my sister's name)
Occasionally we set appositives off with dashes--if they are more interrupter than anything else.
Any reasonable excuse--a family crisis, illness, a snowstorm--will be accepted for your absence from the meeting.
Yours in grammar,
Darlene
Hi Magolla--
Ooh--you are in touch with your inner rebel. And that's just how you build confidence in your writing--in style and voice more than making everything "perfect."
Good for you!
Yours in grammar,
Darlene
Hi Tonya--
We aren't in the business of slapping with rulers! Our method is more gentle because we want you to be the diva of your own writing.
Yours in grammar,
Darlene
Okay this is so great! Thanks for joining us. This is way to early to take it all in. I will be reading this again. Most likely several times for it to soak in.
Thanks Liz for inviting the Divas back in time for Nano!
Okay, I just finished writing four pages of new stuff, and I have another question.
When it was just her and Maria, Jordan leaned closer.
Is it she and Maria or her and Maria??
I know it is when it was just her, but it sounds funny.
I'll be gone for a few hours today to babysit my granddaughter while my DIL finds out if she's blessing me with another granddaughter or a grandson. So keep the questions coming,.. Ill check in when I get home.
Hi Mary--thanks for inviting us back! Hope you get some good info to help polisih your WIP.
Yours in Grammar,
Darlene
Hi Liz--How exciting to find out about the new grandbaby. Now you'll be set to buy all the "right" clothing at sales!
Okay--the grtammar question...technically, we should not be saying: When it was just her or When it just was her and Maria...
The verb "was" is a linking verb and doesn't take the objective form of pronouns. So When it was just she is grammatically correct, but no one in her right mind speaks this way...right?
Usage overrides technical here. And so you can get away saying When it was just her and Maria.
Ahem...however, you know there's something that doesn't sound right here. The problem is the "it was" construction. The vague "it was " (or There were) type of sentence starter leaves your writing a bit weak.
When it was just her and Maria? When what was just her and Maria. Clarify this clause and you'll amke the whole sentence stronger:
When she and Maria were alone, Jordan leaned closer.
Much better! Usually when you have a niggling problem with something we frequently say (but is not the best grammar), you have other structural issues to repair. Or at least you have a way to re-write the sentence and take out the odd construction that you think doesn't sound right.
Yours in grammar,
Darlene
So, everyone, which side are you on? End a sentence in a preposition are not?
Of course you can end a sentence in a preposition! Examples of perfectly clear and grammatical setnence construction abound.
If the sentence becomes messy because of the preposition at the end, rewrite for clarity and common sense reasons!
See, folks! We still disagree on this one.
Yours in grammar,
Darlene
Just got home. My kids are having another girl, and they're naming her after my mother. Ahhhhhhhhh.
Anyway, this has been a quiet day on the blog. What's up with that? Oh, I know. It's the start of NaNo today. Everybody is staying off the Internet to get their word count in.
At any rate, I do appreciate all the good advice from the Divas and want to thanks them again for being here today.
Thanks for having us, Liz. We enjoyed it!
What a helpful reference for writers. I'm glad I found it even if I am a few days (weeks?) late.
Post a Comment